“Scientific Creationism”, Evolution & Race
2004, Feb 1st | Category: Creationism, PseudoscienceSome parts of the scientific creationist position dealing with the human fossil record and racial origins.
Some parts of the scientific creationist position dealing with the human fossil record and racial origins.
No biologist worth her or his salt would deny that the fossil record is incomplete. At best, we have a sketchy idea. However, stating that an inaccuracy in general biology textbooks is proof that the modern theory of evolution must be wrong is beyond ludicrous. Yet this seems to be the reasoning of Rev. Jonathan Wells’ book “Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth.”
Is “Scientific Creationism” really scientific? This article investigates and finds some ugly truths.
An appeal to Creationists to prove some of their many claims. It is about time that they got started.
Here is why you shouldn’t. It isn’t a question of belief, but knowledge.
How Creationists misled the public through a public campaign to discredit Evolution.
Some descriptions of strategies that are commonly used in attempts to force “creation science” into public schools, and suggestions on how to respond.
Does fairness demand that creationism should be taught alongside evolution?
Kent Hovind is one of America’s leading young-earth Creationists and offers a $250,000 award to anyone who is able to prove (to his satisfaction) that Evolution occurs.
Even today, there are still people climbing the mountains of Iraq and Armenia, searching for the ark of Noah. Here are just a few reasons why they search in vain.
What happens if rabbits multiplied the same way Creationists calculate the human population growth after the Flood?
Various cultures have vastly different explanations of how the world came about. Why must it be the Creationist explanation that is true?
A brief history on how Creationism has changed, yet still maintain Evolution is false.
OK, so if you found a watch lying in the desert, would you assume that it “spontaneously assembled” itself from the desert sand and rocks?
If you believe in the Biblical Flood, there is a couple of things you should consider. Quite a lot, actually…
Evolution is impossible because it breaks the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Oh, yeah? Bob Riggins has news for you.
Believing in Creationism does present a few problems. Here is a “handful”.
God’s design of Nature turns out to be less-than-perfect. In fact, it seems there is no end to the examples of just how poor a job he did.
An ugly sound, but we already have a ghetto – of the scientifically illiterate.